123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869 |
- /*
- Copyright (c) 1990-1999 Info-ZIP. All rights reserved.
- See the accompanying file LICENSE, version 1999-Oct-05 or later
- (the contents of which are also included in zip.h) for terms of use.
- If, for some reason, both of these files are missing, the Info-ZIP license
- also may be found at: ftp://ftp.cdrom.com/pub/infozip/license.html
- */
- /*
- This is an Important note about pathnames
- */
- static char DuplicVolumeNote[] = {
- "\rIMPORTANT NOTE:" \
- "\r" \
- "\r This port has one weak point: It is based on pathnames !! " \
- "\r Because it's a port !! Unlike MacOS: As far as I know all other "\
- "\r Operatingsystems (eg.: Unix, DOS, OS/2, ...) are based on pathnames" \
- "\r " \
- /* a short quote from "Inside Macintintosh, Files"; slightly modified by me */
- "\r On a Mac: Files and directories located in the same directory " \
- "\r must all have unique names. However, there is no requirement " \
- "\r that volumes have unique names. It is perfectly acceptable for two mounted" \
- "\r volumes to have the same name. This is one reason why a application should " \
- "\r use volume reference numbers rather than volume names to specify volumes," \
- "\r but for this Zip-Port I can't use reference numbers. " \
- "\r " \
- /* end quote */
- "\r" \
- "\r From the developers point of view:"\
- "\r The use of pathnames, however, is highly discouraged. If the user changes"\
- "\r names or moves things around, they are worthless." \
- "\r Full pathnames are particularly unreliable as a means of identifying files," \
- "\r directories or volumes within your application," \
- "\r for two primary reasons:" \
- "\r" \
- "\r* The user can change the name of any element in the path at" \
- "\r virtually any time." \
- "\r* Volume names on the Macintosh are *not* unique. Multiple" \
- "\r mounted volumes can have the same name. For this reason, the use of" \
- "\r a full pathname to identify a specific volume may not produce the" \
- "\r results you expect. If more than one volume has the same name and" \
- "\r a full pathname is used, the File Manager currently uses the first" \
- "\r mounted volume it finds with a matching name in the volume queue." \
- "\r" \
- "\r" \
- "\r The main reason is that an attempt to implement support exact saving of" \
- "\r the MacOS specific internal file-structures would require a throughout" \
- "\r rewrite of major parts of shared code, probably sacrifying compatibility" \
- "\r with other systems." \
- "\r I have no solution at the moment. The port will just warn you if you try" \
- "\r zip from / to a volume which has a duplicate name." \
- "\r MacZip has problems to find the archives and files." \
- "\r" \
- "\r" \
- "\r ... and the moral of this story:" \
- "\r" \
- "\r Don't mount multiple volumes with the same " \
- "\r name while zip/unzip is running" \
- "\r and "\
- "\r My (Big) recommendation: Name all your volumes with a unique name "\
- "\r (e.g: add a space character to the name) and" \
- "\r MacZip will run without any problem." \
- "\r" \
- "\r" \
- "\r Dirk Haase" \
- };
|